eArsiv@Adu

Evaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gholipoor, Manoochehr
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-18T14:11:31Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-18T14:11:31Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Gholipoor, M. (2009).Evaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulation.International Meeting on Soil Fertility Land Management and Agroclimatology,Special Issue,737-748. tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11607/2637
dc.description.abstract In no-till management, the crop residue is left on the soil surface. The effect of residue on water relations of soil, and subsequently that of plant are highly dependent on weather conditions. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of maize residue (3.85 mg ha-1) on water relations of rainfed chickpea, using model CYRUS. Firstly, this model was recoded in Qbasic programming; then a simple sub-routine was added to include the effect of crop residue; finally, it was run for long-term daily weather data (1961-2004) of Maragheh (winter-dominant rainfall), Iran. It was revealed that, as compared to control, the residue treatment results in that the value of fraction transpiration soil water in rooting depth [FTSW: ranges from 0 (wilting point) to 1 (field capacity)] to be 2.72% higher during emergence (E) to flowering (R1), 10.02% higher across R1 to pod initiation (R3), 7.59% higher for R3 to pod filling (R5), 1.82% higher during R5 to pod yellowing (R7) and 1.32% more over R7 to maturity (R8). Across the S-E, E-R1, and R1- R3 periods, the value of evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for non-mulching conditions, as compared to mulching conditions. On the other hand, across the R5-R7 and R7-R8 period, that of ET appeared to be higher for mulching than non-mulching conditions. The difference between named conditions for transpiration appeared to be negligible across R3-R5 period; while it was considerable over other periods. Across the E-R1 period, the transpired water from covered-soil was 56.89 mm, which is about 3.34 mm higher than that from bared-soil. This increasing effect of residue was 6.8% across R3-R5 period, 23.0% across R5-R7, and 35.1% across R7-R8. Considering the ratio of transpiration to evaporation, the mentioned beneficial impact of residue was more considerable across reproductive stages (R1-R8), than across vegetative stage (E-R1). The difference between bared- and covered-soil for named ratio was 0.14 over E-R1 period, 2.00 over R1-R3 period, 3.49 over R3-R5 period, 4.87 over R5-R7 period, and 2.98 over R7-R8 period. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Cropresidue tr_TR
dc.subject Waterrelation tr_TR
dc.subject Chickpea tr_TR
dc.subject Simulation tr_TR
dc.title Evaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulation tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal International Meeting on Soil Fertility Land Management and Agroclimatology tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding,Shahrood University of Technology tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 737 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 748 tr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account