eArşiv@Adu

Preterm doğum eyleminin tedavisinden ifedipin ile hidrasyon+sedasyon'un karşılaştırılması: prospektifklinik bir çalışma

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Naykı, Cenk
dc.contributor.author İnal, Murat
dc.contributor.author Yıldırım, Yusuf
dc.contributor.author Tınar, Şivekar
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-01T06:50:00Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-01T06:50:00Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation Naykı, C., İnal, M.,Yıldırım, Y., Tınar, Ş.(2007).Preterm doğum eyleminin tedavisinden ifedipin ile hidrasyon+sedasyon'un karşılaştırılması: prospektifklinik bir çalışma.Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi,8(1),23-26. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 2149-9063
dc.identifier.uri http://meandrosmedicaljournal.org/article_9485/Comparison-Of-Nifedipine-And-Hydration-Sedation-In-The-Treatment-Of-Preterm-Delivery-A-Prospective-Clinical-Study
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11607/2174
dc.description.abstract To compare the effectiveness of hydration + sedation and nifedipine in the treatment of preterm delivery. Between November 2003 and March 2005, a total of 130 pregnant women hospitalized at our hospital due to preterm labor were enrolled in the study. Of these, 70 (group 1) received hydration+sedation and the remaining 60 (group 2) received nifedipine. All pregnant women were followed up to delivery and obstetric and perinatal data were recorded. Groups were similar with respect to patients' demographic and reproductive characteristics, risk factors for preterm delivery, gestational week at the time of application and cervical length measured by ultrasound (p>0.05). Mean time between diagnosis and delivery was 35.8±4.2 days in group 1 and was 35.4±4.5 days in group 2 (p=0.84). Mean birth weight was 2970±226 grams for group 1 and was 2880±231 grams for group 2 (p=0.17). There was also no significant difference between the groups with respect to parenteral tocolysis requirement (p=0.07) and delivery prior to 37 weeks of gestation (p=0.62). In contrast to literature data, our study results suggest that hydration + sedation treatment may be a reasonable approach before administrating tocolysis. However, larger and placebo controlled studies are needed to recommend this approach as an alternative to tocolysis. tr_TR
dc.language.iso tur tr_TR
dc.publisher Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Preterm Doğum tr_TR
dc.subject Hidrasyon+Sedasyon tr_TR
dc.subject Nifedipin tr_TR
dc.subject Preterm Delivery tr_TR
dc.subject Hydration+Sedation tr_TR
dc.subject Nifedipine tr_TR
dc.title Preterm doğum eyleminin tedavisinden ifedipin ile hidrasyon+sedasyon'un karşılaştırılması: prospektifklinik bir çalışma tr_TR
dc.title.alternative Comparison of nifedipine and hydration + sedation in the treatment of preterm delivery: a prospective clinical study tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID TR29400 tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID TR46037 tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID TR124666 tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Ege Doğumevi ve Kadın Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 1 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 8 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 23 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 26 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster