Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11607/2637
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGholipoor, Manoochehr-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-18T14:11:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-18T14:11:31Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationGholipoor, M. (2009).Evaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulation.International Meeting on Soil Fertility Land Management and Agroclimatology,Special Issue,737-748.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11607/2637-
dc.description.abstractIn no-till management, the crop residue is left on the soil surface. The effect of residue on water relations of soil, and subsequently that of plant are highly dependent on weather conditions. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of maize residue (3.85 mg ha-1) on water relations of rainfed chickpea, using model CYRUS. Firstly, this model was recoded in Qbasic programming; then a simple sub-routine was added to include the effect of crop residue; finally, it was run for long-term daily weather data (1961-2004) of Maragheh (winter-dominant rainfall), Iran. It was revealed that, as compared to control, the residue treatment results in that the value of fraction transpiration soil water in rooting depth [FTSW: ranges from 0 (wilting point) to 1 (field capacity)] to be 2.72% higher during emergence (E) to flowering (R1), 10.02% higher across R1 to pod initiation (R3), 7.59% higher for R3 to pod filling (R5), 1.82% higher during R5 to pod yellowing (R7) and 1.32% more over R7 to maturity (R8). Across the S-E, E-R1, and R1- R3 periods, the value of evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for non-mulching conditions, as compared to mulching conditions. On the other hand, across the R5-R7 and R7-R8 period, that of ET appeared to be higher for mulching than non-mulching conditions. The difference between named conditions for transpiration appeared to be negligible across R3-R5 period; while it was considerable over other periods. Across the E-R1 period, the transpired water from covered-soil was 56.89 mm, which is about 3.34 mm higher than that from bared-soil. This increasing effect of residue was 6.8% across R3-R5 period, 23.0% across R5-R7, and 35.1% across R7-R8. Considering the ratio of transpiration to evaporation, the mentioned beneficial impact of residue was more considerable across reproductive stages (R1-R8), than across vegetative stage (E-R1). The difference between bared- and covered-soil for named ratio was 0.14 over E-R1 period, 2.00 over R1-R3 period, 3.49 over R3-R5 period, 4.87 over R5-R7 period, and 2.98 over R7-R8 period.tr_TR
dc.language.isoengtr_TR
dc.publisherAdnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectCropresiduetr_TR
dc.subjectWaterrelationtr_TR
dc.subjectChickpeatr_TR
dc.subjectSimulationtr_TR
dc.titleEvaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulationtr_TR
dc.typearticletr_TR
dc.relation.journalInternational Meeting on Soil Fertility Land Management and Agroclimatologytr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding,Shahrood University of Technologytr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage737tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage748tr_TR
Appears in Collections:2009 Özel Sayı

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
081.pdfMakale Dosyası112.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.