Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11607/2637
Title: Evaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulation
Authors: Gholipoor, Manoochehr
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding,Shahrood University of Technology
Keywords: Cropresidue
Waterrelation
Chickpea
Simulation
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
Citation: Gholipoor, M. (2009).Evaluating the effect of crop residue on water relations of rainfed chickpeain maragheh, Iran, using simulation.International Meeting on Soil Fertility Land Management and Agroclimatology,Special Issue,737-748.
Abstract: In no-till management, the crop residue is left on the soil surface. The effect of residue on water relations of soil, and subsequently that of plant are highly dependent on weather conditions. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of maize residue (3.85 mg ha-1) on water relations of rainfed chickpea, using model CYRUS. Firstly, this model was recoded in Qbasic programming; then a simple sub-routine was added to include the effect of crop residue; finally, it was run for long-term daily weather data (1961-2004) of Maragheh (winter-dominant rainfall), Iran. It was revealed that, as compared to control, the residue treatment results in that the value of fraction transpiration soil water in rooting depth [FTSW: ranges from 0 (wilting point) to 1 (field capacity)] to be 2.72% higher during emergence (E) to flowering (R1), 10.02% higher across R1 to pod initiation (R3), 7.59% higher for R3 to pod filling (R5), 1.82% higher during R5 to pod yellowing (R7) and 1.32% more over R7 to maturity (R8). Across the S-E, E-R1, and R1- R3 periods, the value of evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for non-mulching conditions, as compared to mulching conditions. On the other hand, across the R5-R7 and R7-R8 period, that of ET appeared to be higher for mulching than non-mulching conditions. The difference between named conditions for transpiration appeared to be negligible across R3-R5 period; while it was considerable over other periods. Across the E-R1 period, the transpired water from covered-soil was 56.89 mm, which is about 3.34 mm higher than that from bared-soil. This increasing effect of residue was 6.8% across R3-R5 period, 23.0% across R5-R7, and 35.1% across R7-R8. Considering the ratio of transpiration to evaporation, the mentioned beneficial impact of residue was more considerable across reproductive stages (R1-R8), than across vegetative stage (E-R1). The difference between bared- and covered-soil for named ratio was 0.14 over E-R1 period, 2.00 over R1-R3 period, 3.49 over R3-R5 period, 4.87 over R5-R7 period, and 2.98 over R7-R8 period.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11607/2637
Appears in Collections:2009 Özel Sayı

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
081.pdfMakale Dosyası112.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.