Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11607/2174
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaykı, Cenk-
dc.contributor.authorİnal, Murat-
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Yusuf-
dc.contributor.authorTınar, Şivekar-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-01T06:50:00Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-01T06:50:00Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationNaykı, C., İnal, M.,Yıldırım, Y., Tınar, Ş.(2007).Preterm doğum eyleminin tedavisinden ifedipin ile hidrasyon+sedasyon'un karşılaştırılması: prospektifklinik bir çalışma.Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi,8(1),23-26.tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn2149-9063-
dc.identifier.urihttp://meandrosmedicaljournal.org/article_9485/Comparison-Of-Nifedipine-And-Hydration-Sedation-In-The-Treatment-Of-Preterm-Delivery-A-Prospective-Clinical-Study-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11607/2174-
dc.description.abstractTo compare the effectiveness of hydration + sedation and nifedipine in the treatment of preterm delivery. Between November 2003 and March 2005, a total of 130 pregnant women hospitalized at our hospital due to preterm labor were enrolled in the study. Of these, 70 (group 1) received hydration+sedation and the remaining 60 (group 2) received nifedipine. All pregnant women were followed up to delivery and obstetric and perinatal data were recorded. Groups were similar with respect to patients' demographic and reproductive characteristics, risk factors for preterm delivery, gestational week at the time of application and cervical length measured by ultrasound (p>0.05). Mean time between diagnosis and delivery was 35.8±4.2 days in group 1 and was 35.4±4.5 days in group 2 (p=0.84). Mean birth weight was 2970±226 grams for group 1 and was 2880±231 grams for group 2 (p=0.17). There was also no significant difference between the groups with respect to parenteral tocolysis requirement (p=0.07) and delivery prior to 37 weeks of gestation (p=0.62). In contrast to literature data, our study results suggest that hydration + sedation treatment may be a reasonable approach before administrating tocolysis. However, larger and placebo controlled studies are needed to recommend this approach as an alternative to tocolysis.tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherAdnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectPreterm Doğumtr_TR
dc.subjectHidrasyon+Sedasyontr_TR
dc.subjectNifedipintr_TR
dc.subjectPreterm Deliverytr_TR
dc.subjectHydration+Sedationtr_TR
dc.subjectNifedipinetr_TR
dc.titlePreterm doğum eyleminin tedavisinden ifedipin ile hidrasyon+sedasyon'un karşılaştırılması: prospektifklinik bir çalışmatr_TR
dc.title.alternativeComparison of nifedipine and hydration + sedation in the treatment of preterm delivery: a prospective clinical studytr_TR
dc.typearticletr_TR
dc.relation.journalAdnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisitr_TR
dc.contributor.authorIDTR29400tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorIDTR46037tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorIDTR124666tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentEge Doğumevi ve Kadın Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalıtr_TR
dc.identifier.volume1tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue8tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage23tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage26tr_TR
Appears in Collections:2007 Cilt 8 Sayı 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
23-26.pdfMakale Dosyası75.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.