Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11607/1776
Title: | Comparison of anesthesia quality for arthroscopic knee surgery: Combined sciatic femoral block and unilateral spinal anesthesia |
Other Titles: | Artroskopik diz cerrahisi için anestezi kalitesinin karşılaştırılması: Kombine siyatik femoral blok ve tek taraflı spinal anestezi |
Authors: | Sarı, Sinem Eroğlu, Füsun Fusco, Pierfirancesco Atay, Tolga Ceylan, Berit Gökçe TR176226 Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anestezi Bölümü |
Keywords: | Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Levobupivacaine Siyatik Femoral Blok Tek Taraflı Spinal Anestezi Levobupivakain |
Issue Date: | 2015 |
Publisher: | Meandros Medical and Dental Journal |
Citation: | Sarı, S., Eroğlu, F., Fusco, P., Atay, T., Ceylan, B. G.(2015) Comparison of anesthesia quality for arthroscopic knee surgery: Combined sciatic femoral block and unilateral spinal anesthesia. Meandros Medical and Dental Journal, 16(2) 59-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/meandros.2389 |
Abstract: | Objective: We aimed to evaluate the quality of anesthesia of combined sciatic and
femoral 3-in-1 nerve blocks (CSFB) and unilateral spinal anesthesia technique with
low-dose levobupivacaine in outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy surgery.
Materials and Methods: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
physical status I-II patients were randomly allocated into two groups and unilateral
spinal anesthesia with low-dose levobupivacaine (group S, n=20) or CSFB (group B,
n=20) was performed. Besides the quality of anesthesia, anesthetic effectiveness,
hemodynamic values, duration of the technique application, maximum motor and
sensorial block levels and durations, the first analgesics need, and total analgesic
consumptions during postoperative 24 hours and determined complications were
compared between the two groups.
Results: The quality of anesthesia was better in group S, no patient received either
sedation or analgesic intraoperatively while first analgesic need and number of
patient was higher (p=0.014, p<0.001, p=0.032 respectively). The duration of
technical application was shorter while maximum motor and sensorial block levels
were higher in group S (p<0.0001, p=0.008, p<0.001 respectively). Motor block
duration was significantly longer in group B (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: We concluded that CSFB practice is an effective anesthetic alternative
for unilateral spinal anesthesia. Amaç: Günübirlik diz artroskopisi cerrahisinde kombine siyatik ve femoral üçü bir arada blok ile düşük doz levobupivakain ile yapılan tek taraflı spinal anestezi tekniklerinin anestezi kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II 40 hasta rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı ve tek taraflı spinal anestezi (grup S, n=20) veya kombine siyatik ve femoral üçü bir arada blok (grup B, n=20) uygulandı. Anestezi kalitesinin yanı sıra, hemodinamik değerler, teknik uygulama süresi, maksimum motor ve duyusal blok düzey ve süreleri, ilk analjezik gereksinimi ve postoperatif 24 saat süresince toplam analjezik tüketimi, saptanan komplikasyonlar iki grup arasında karşılaştırıldı. |
URI: | http://meandrosmedicaljournal.org/makale_9762/Artroskopik-Diz-Cerrahisi-Icin-Anestezi-Kalitesinin-Karsilastirilmasi-Kombine-Siyatik-Femoral-Blok-Ve-Tek-Tarafli-Spinal-Anestezi http://hdl.handle.net/11607/1776 |
ISSN: | 2149-9063 |
Appears in Collections: | 2015 Cilt 16 Sayı 2 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.